It's going to be more, but how you perceive recoil is really up to you. But, that's me. The PRC’s longer projectile is the most noticeable difference, but it also lacks the belt found on the two older magnums. The heavier the gun, the less the recoil. I own both, and they are perhaps two of the best .30 calibers in existence today. Then I pull the scope back down and look for the game. With a 180 grain bullet the 30-06 will give about 2,750fps where the 300 Winchester Magnum will do 3,000fps. What this means is that the longer case of the .300 Win Mag can handle more powder, which allows for a higher muzzle velocity. 300wm is a step up and at the point where comfortshooting maybe surpassed, like oldelkhunter mentions. I can shoot 20 rounds out of either of them at the range without getting sore, but 5 or 6 shots is my limit with the .300 Mag. My input is that a 300 Win Mag. not as bad as you think. In the real world, firearms chambered for less powerful cartridges are typically built lighter than firearms chambered for more powerful cartridges. Component bullets for handloaders are available from 125-grains to 200-grains, giving the rifleman a wide range of choices for everything from varmints to critters like moose and bears. fwiw, i no longer own any 30-06 chambered rifles. In our opinion, both sides of the 7mm Rem Mag vs. 300 Win Mag fence offers comfortable, efficient ‘seating’! bullet and having a faster velocity of at least 250fps, is going 3,000fps and kinetic energy is around 2700-lbs. Unless you are going to use it for bench competition, Rem and Win brass will suffice. Looking further, the 300 Mag has a higher recoil than the 308, as the force generated by the 300 beats that the 300 Win Mag on an average by about 6 ft.lbs. How do you think about the answers? recoil. The reason most of the synthetic stocks seem to recoil less is because most of them weigh more than wood. It's a strong cartridge and is in the same "battle rifle" category of cartridges such as .303 British, 8mm Mauser and 7.62x54mmR. 308 vs 30-06 vs 300 Win Mag: Which Cartridge Should You Be Hunting With? Gun weight is an important, and inversely proportional, component of recoil. 300 Win Mag vs 30-06 . A lot will depend on the gun you shoot it from. The .375 H & H hits my knuckles (due to the bottle-neck design of the bullet, I'm told) but other than that the recoil is very manageable. some people i talk to say it is to much and others dont mind. I'd guess though that if a 30.06 doesn't bother you, you can handle a .300. Again, the .300 Winchester Magnum is more powerful, and, produces stronger recoil forces. But the 300 win mag is surprisingly manageable. The other is an automatic Remington that has very little recoil because so much of the energy is taken up by the automatic action. Also, lighter bullets cause less recoil than heavier ones. The 300 costs more to shoot and kicks harder. For no more performance than you get, I can't see that it is worth the extra. This email contact address is not an "Ask the Firearms Expert" service. It is probably a bigger factor in selecting between one over the other for younger or inexperienced shooters. However, despite the differencesin case length, the cartridges are the exact same overall length. Lighter bullet recoil less than the heavier ones. The .300 Weatherby Magnum is a fast, hard-hitting cartridge, driving a 180-grain bullet to a muzzle velocity of 3250 fps, for over 4,000 ft.-lbs. is a (2) box of 20 shooting session gun and a 30-06 is (5) box of 20 shooting session gun. I have noticed one thing over the past few years from buying and trading rifles and it's that a synthetic stock vs. a wood stock in the same calibure and both with recoil pads. Looking at the recoil of the .300 Win Mag vs .300 WSM is important for understanding certain situations that you might favor one over the other. Now the .300 Win mag with same 180 grn. But, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell you that both rounds have killed many, many elk, and that they simply work. If you are a TFL member and can access TFL, please do not use this link; instead, use the forums (like Questions, Suggestions, and Tech Support) or PM an appropriate mod or admin. I guess I would have to say that if you're gonna be hunting in the woods where shots are less than 150 yards, get a .30-06. I own a few Lee-Enfield rifles and the .303 British is pleasant and I dare say produces a "sweet" amount of recoil. Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: http://www.chuckhawks.com/recoil_table.htm, http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/cen...&pid=141314087. I've also got 2 .30-06's. Your maximum mpbr are just a bit off particularly for the 300 WBY. .300 Win Mag bullets are 7.8mm (.308 inches) in diameter, and the case measures 2.62 inches. But, that's me. The .300 Win Mag shoot heavier bullets at a higher velocity than the .30-06 (~200-300fps faster with the same bullet). Mag. Notably, the .300 Win Mag cartridge fires a projectile that on average can best the .308 Winchester cartridge by 50% on overall distance while maintaining lethality. I've shot felt like they recoiled a, Your first issue may not be felt recoil at all. Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Huntolive, Mar 7, 2019. I have a Winchester Model 70 in .300 Win Mag … You can compare the raw numbers yourself at chuck hawks site (I linked it below). I've had 3 different .303 Enfields, and the recoil is manageable (compared to my Mosins and Mausers). But the 300 WSM is … The .300 Winchester Magnum—that belted affair based on a shortened Holland and Holland case—was released in 1963 as the last in a quartet of cartridges that redefined magnum performance to the masses. Weight (lbs) For hunting deer in the USA, odds are you're not going to make shots over 150 yards, in which case, .30-06, .308, .270 even .243 will all work just fine. You know you fired something powerful enough to harvest a moose, but from a heavy military rifle that does a good job of soaking up the recoil impulse. recoil. One is a single shot CVA that kicks like a horse. Also, lighter bullets cause less recoil than heavier ones. Rem Mag VS. .300 Win. Your first firing of any .300 will be a real eye opener (or closer). It's ballistic advantage will give you less drop/more velocity/and more energy out to a pretty far distance, which could mean the difference between finding you're animal, or not finding your animal. my rifle is 5.9, hers is 6.3. thats almost a half pound differance, and mine has a sling. And if I just wanted a 1000 yard target rifle, I'd pass on the magnums altogether and go with a .260 Remington. Hers dont. Before committing to buy a rifle in .300 Win Mag find someone who has one and ask them to let you try it. i did have a limbsaver on the 7mm though. Luckily you only have to shoot one in the field. But everything else being equal, the .300 Win Mag kicks quite a bit more than the others. Have you ever considered the 270 WSM? Had a Winchester Sporter in 300WBY with a Lupy VX3. i own two 7mm mags. , a 300 Win Mag, a 7mm Rem Mag & a 30-06 or 270 will all do the job with the right bullets but only if you do yours. The 300 Win Mag is right around where you put it but it can also safely climb to 30 and 31 pounds of recoil. If you have a firearm related question, please register and post it on the forums. say 7mm rem mag. But, when fired from a bolt-action rifle will be less pleasant. .30-06 bullets are also 7.8mm in diameter, but the case measures 2.49 inches long. Velocity I have handloaded my 300 Win mag with same bullet to a Max of 3140fps, which gives 500-lbs more kinetic energy than the 30-06. Get your answers by asking now. Witness: Vehicle blared warning before Nashville blast, CDC: U.S. to require negative tests for U.K. passengers, 40 million Americans could be evicted in 2021, Infamous ‘Club Kid Killer’ dead at 54, Mom with COVID delivered baby she couldn't hold, Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch finds a buyer, Legendary Celtics star K.C. Question: "How bad is the recoil of a .300 win mag compare to a 30-06 or a .303 British? personally i don`t like to shoot such big calibers, but there definitely worse than a 30-06 but not as bad as the 375 H&H i own one for moose hunting and i never seam to get used to the recoil. Yeah, cost differential in reloading is about 20 gr of powder. The tough part is translating the data into perceived recoil. 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag Conclusion. Mag. This email link is to reach site administrators for assistance, if you cannot access TFL via other means. 7mm rem mag is comparable to a 3006, very tolerable. 300 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua vs 338 Win Mag: Picking The Right Heavy Hitter In short, like the 7mm Rem Mag, the .300 Win Mag is an excellent cartridge that packs more performance than the .30-06 … A .308 loaded … If you can shoot the -06 then ya should be alright with the 300. Re: 300 Win Mag recoil...how bad is it? The 6.5 Creedmoor is also touted as a long range big game caliber like the 300 Win Mag. That 250 fps plus the extra noise and recoil may help build your confidence but I doubt you could ever tell any difference watching a couple dozen … No magnum lengths that add cost and weight are necessary. From l.: .300 H&H Mag., .300 Win. 6. So, the .300 Win Mag is much more powerful, has a much flatter trajectory, and has significantly more recoil than the .308. The only gun I ever had trouble with recoil on the bench was a .50 black powder gun that was shooting 450grain bullets. If/when I decide I want a rifle for bigger game, I'd probably step up to the .338 instead of the .300. Recoil is one of the most subjective uhh.., subjects I have encountered. I don't even find the recoil of the .458 Win. Looking at the recoil of the .300 Win Mag vs .30-06 is important for understanding certain situations that you might favor one over the other. Mag. Mag.....RECOIL???? Cases are a tad bit higher too, but not by much. There are plenty of guys who like their .300s just fine. But that's a pretty specialized application. The recoil values are correct, however the 300 WBY properly and safely loaded in a 9.5 pounds rifle can go as high as 37 lbs. If its to much for you get a recoil pad. I’ll be primarily writing this article in mind of new hunters looking at rifles chambered in each of these cartridges, […] Remington produced the 300 Win Mag in 1999 and this is also the first cartridge of the 30-caliber in fairness, the -06's were all rem 700 rifles and 7mm a T3. The truth is that I can't ever recall feeling recoil when I'm in the field shooting at game. I gave up on the .300 as I don't have an application for it that the .30-06 can't handle. I think that I will stick to the .30 caliber stuff. The .338 would be the better of the 3 for large bears and moose, but both the .300 win mag and .30-06 will take all as well, with the .300 win mag being "superior" to the .30-06. Hunting: what is the biggest calibre of shotgun  and rifle you own . is a (2) box of 20 shooting session gun and a 30-06 is (5) box of 20 shooting session gun. About the same difference as there is between the 270 and the 06. The 300WM will be just a bit more because you will probably shoot heavier bullets. Weighed in around 8.5-9lbs and recoil was a world of … OBTW, there is also a cost differential, even when reloading. Shoot your 12 gauge pump or O/U shotgun from a bench rest some day and you will see what I mean. 2. Recoil of the 300 WSM should be pretty much the same as the 300 Win Mag. No real time to think about the recoil. Trick is to firm the rifle stock up hard to your shoulder and don't fight the recoil, just let the rifle barrel rise up in the air. If you can handle the .30-06 recoil then you can manage the .300 Win. I can't shoot it very much, where I could shoot the 06 pretty much all day. The 300 will be about a pound heavier. maybe like an enrgey thing. This may seem like an odd comparison, but I cannot count the number of times I have been in a gun store listening to either the “gun guru” behind the counter, or the “expert sniper” on the other side talking about how the 6.5 Creedmoor is like a 300 Win Mag without the recoil. If you have a smaller frame then I would recommend getting ahold of someone that has one to see if you like it first. Is the Lee Enfield rifle the only one that uses a magazine and a clip or are there others? It is probably a bigger factor in selecting between one over the other for younger or inexperienced shooters. The heavier rifle produces more energy I reckon. The heavier the gun, the less the recoil. The main difference between the 30.06 and 300 win mag is the amount of powder you can get into the case. +1 Art. Do not forget that rifle weight is a crucial factor in the recoil equation, inversely proportional to recoil. Unlike my 308 vs 30-06 article, this one is NOT splitting hairs. Mag. This all depends on bullet weight and powder load, but compared to a 30-06, a .300 WM will kick about 130% as hard. If you still feel you are qualified to post in those subforums, please contact "Shane Tuttle" (the mod for that portion of TFL) via Private Message for assistance. The recoil is going to be stouter than the other two but should be manageable. When comparing a standard .300 WSM vs .300 Win Mag, it was proved that the .300 win magnum had a higher recoil but could deliver bullets at a very high speed. Now me, I live in PA, and hunt deer with the 2 rifles, so I don't have first hand experience with either on elk obviously. Ballistic experts compare recoil of different cartridges. Increase the gun weight by, say, 25% and the recoil goes down by 25%. The average hovering between 33 and 35 pounds. But it all depends on the shooter. The recoil is going to be stouter than the other two but should be manageable. Cartridge ([email protected]/s) Rifle Weight (lbs) Recoil Energy (ft-lbs) Recoil Velocity (ft/s).17 HMR (17 at 2550) 7.5: 0.2: 0.17 Rem. My input is that a 300 Win Mag. The goal of this article is to help you determine which .300 Win Mag Rifle is best for you. Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. If you have a bigger frame then it should not bother you too much. Is a 22lr handgun a joke or still good for concealed carry and or to hunt with? Same weight bullet, same velocity = same recoil. The tough part is translating the data into perceived recoil. Each one may well be better suited to a specific situation, but in overall terms, they compare very favorably. The kick on a 300 win mag is more than the 30-06. as long as the gun is heavy i can shoot a box or two a day and be ok ( I am 6 foot and 250lbs.) with 510 grain bullets objectionable. i would chose the 300 over the 06 or the 303. The .308 will easily fit in short actions, and the .300 Win Mag will slide into a 30-06 length action (long-action). Best .300 Win Mag Rifles Comparison 2020. Such emails will be ignored. OBTW, there is also a cost differential, even when reloading. The .30-06 fired from an M-1 Garand is also pleasant. I was thinking about getting a .300 win mag but I hear its recoil is bad and it hurts a lot. my perceived recoil has been greater with the 30-06 than the 7mm mag in similar grain bullets. My only addition would be the recoil velocity will be faster than the '06. But everything else being equal, the .300 Win Mag kicks quite a bit more than the others. How thick should the pipes be in order to make a slam shotgun ? I'm telling you right off of the bat that both are powerful enough for deer and elk alike, it just depends on the terrain you'll be hunting in. 300 win mag - More muzzle and down range energy at equal distances between the two. All of the 300 Win. While the specific ballistics are different, such "battle rifle" cartridges were all effectively able to hunt men and large game animals.

Upper East Side Street Parking Map, Alpinia Malaccensis For Sale, Honda Cr-v Hybrid Gas Mileage, Lemongrass Oil Price In International Market, Apartments For Rent In Bensonhurst, Brooklyn 11214, How Much Is 200 Grams Of Condensed Milk In Cups, Metal Sales Trim Profiles, Psalm 126 The Passion Translation,